https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423512 Bail was refused in a CGST Act case involving alleged wrongful availment and use of input tax credit through fake invoices and non-existent suppliers. The Court treated the matter as a planned economic offence, noted that investigation was still continuing, and relied on documentary material linking the applicant to the alleged offence. It found no breach of the arrest guidelines cited by the applicant and held that the precedent relied on was distinguishable because cooperation with the investigation was not shown and the broker through whom the invoices were allegedly received was not disclosed. On that basis, the Court found a risk of interference with investigation and tampering with evidence. en-us Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 18:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423512 Bail was refused in a CGST Act case involving alleged wrongful availment and use of input tax credit through fake invoices and non-existent suppliers. The Court treated the matter as a planned economic offence, noted that investigation was still continuing, and relied on documentary material linking the applicant to the alleged offence. It found no breach of the arrest guidelines cited by the applicant and held that the precedent relied on was distinguishable because cooperation with the investigation was not shown and the broker through whom the invoices were allegedly received was not disclosed. On that basis, the Court found a risk of interference with investigation and tampering with evidence. Case-Laws GST Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423512