<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 350 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263 was not valid. The assessee was entitled to claim deductions under Section 80IB(11A) for duty drawback and sale of licenses. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Meghalaya Steels Ltd, overruling the earlier Liberty India decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 09:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 350 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263 was not valid. The assessee was entitled to claim deductions under Section 80IB(11A) for duty drawback and sale of licenses. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Meghalaya Steels Ltd, overruling the earlier Liberty India decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>