<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 345 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423504</link>
    <description>Resolution applicants remain bound by approved resolution plans and original bid terms, including performance-security obligations. Repeated failure to furnish the balance security may justify a further time-bound extension and forfeiture of amounts already deposited on continued default, because delay hampers the insolvency process. A later higher offer from an H-2 bidder does not permit reopening a concluded bid process or require the H-1 bidder to match that offer. However, if the H-1 bidder continues to default on the extended security requirement, the Committee of Creditors may negotiate with the H-2 bidder within a time-bound framework and withdraw pending approval applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 09:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 345 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423504</link>
      <description>Resolution applicants remain bound by approved resolution plans and original bid terms, including performance-security obligations. Repeated failure to furnish the balance security may justify a further time-bound extension and forfeiture of amounts already deposited on continued default, because delay hampers the insolvency process. A later higher offer from an H-2 bidder does not permit reopening a concluded bid process or require the H-1 bidder to match that offer. However, if the H-1 bidder continues to default on the extended security requirement, the Committee of Creditors may negotiate with the H-2 bidder within a time-bound framework and withdraw pending approval applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>