<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 340 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, allowing the appeal and directing the exclusion of Infosys BPM Ltd. from the set of comparables. This adjustment rendered the Assessee&#039;s international transactions at Arm&#039;s Length, negating the need for the contentious income enhancements. The Tribunal also upheld the Assessee&#039;s position on the treatment of outstanding receivables, citing relevant judicial precedents. The appeal was allowed in its entirety, and the final assessment order was adjusted accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 340 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, allowing the appeal and directing the exclusion of Infosys BPM Ltd. from the set of comparables. This adjustment rendered the Assessee&#039;s international transactions at Arm&#039;s Length, negating the need for the contentious income enhancements. The Tribunal also upheld the Assessee&#039;s position on the treatment of outstanding receivables, citing relevant judicial precedents. The appeal was allowed in its entirety, and the final assessment order was adjusted accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>