<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 331 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263. The Tribunal found the order to be barred by limitation, invalid due to lack of reasonable opportunity of hearing, failure to establish the erroneous or prejudicial nature of the assessment order, and improper scope of reassessment. Consequently, the original assessment order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 09:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 331 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263. The Tribunal found the order to be barred by limitation, invalid due to lack of reasonable opportunity of hearing, failure to establish the erroneous or prejudicial nature of the assessment order, and improper scope of reassessment. Consequently, the original assessment order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>