<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 323 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423482</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition regarding the provisional attachment of bank accounts for over a year after the respondent&#039;s representative stated that the statutory period for provisional attachment had lapsed, allowing the petitioner to operate the accounts. The petitioner agreed to dispose of the petition based on this representation, leading to the resolution of the provisional attachment issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 323 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423482</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition regarding the provisional attachment of bank accounts for over a year after the respondent&#039;s representative stated that the statutory period for provisional attachment had lapsed, allowing the petitioner to operate the accounts. The petitioner agreed to dispose of the petition based on this representation, leading to the resolution of the provisional attachment issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>