<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 315 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423474</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition, finding no prima facie case for a criminal complaint against the third respondent. The petitioner was advised to seek redressal through appropriate channels under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as the third respondent was found to have acted within legal parameters. The court emphasized that the petitioner could pursue grievances through the prescribed mechanisms of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 315 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423474</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition, finding no prima facie case for a criminal complaint against the third respondent. The petitioner was advised to seek redressal through appropriate channels under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as the third respondent was found to have acted within legal parameters. The court emphasized that the petitioner could pursue grievances through the prescribed mechanisms of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>