https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423468 A person already in judicial custody in another case may still be produced under Section 267 CrPC and remanded in the present proceedings under Section 167 CrPC; the prior custody did not by itself invalidate the remand. Section 19 of the PMLA requires reasons to believe, supporting material, written recording of reasons, and communication of the grounds of arrest, and the court found those requirements satisfied on the facts through service via prison authorities. As earlier proceedings did not stay the investigation or remand process, the remand and subsequent custody orders were sustained and no interference was warranted in quashing jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:33:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423468 A person already in judicial custody in another case may still be produced under Section 267 CrPC and remanded in the present proceedings under Section 167 CrPC; the prior custody did not by itself invalidate the remand. Section 19 of the PMLA requires reasons to believe, supporting material, written recording of reasons, and communication of the grounds of arrest, and the court found those requirements satisfied on the facts through service via prison authorities. As earlier proceedings did not stay the investigation or remand process, the remand and subsequent custody orders were sustained and no interference was warranted in quashing jurisdiction. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423468