https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423456 Recall of a witness under Section 311 CrPC is permitted only when the proposed evidence is essential for a just decision and not when it is sought to fill gaps in the complainant's case. In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the court found that the additional documents did not adequately connect the alleged transaction with the business concern reflected in those documents, and no satisfactory explanation was given for non-production of originals or for their necessity at that stage. The refusal to recall and re-examine the complainant was therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jun 2022 17:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423456 Recall of a witness under Section 311 CrPC is permitted only when the proposed evidence is essential for a just decision and not when it is sought to fill gaps in the complainant's case. In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the court found that the additional documents did not adequately connect the alleged transaction with the business concern reflected in those documents, and no satisfactory explanation was given for non-production of originals or for their necessity at that stage. The refusal to recall and re-examine the complainant was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423456