https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423454 The court affirmed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under section 138 of the N.I. Act, as the appellant failed to establish the monetary transaction and discharge the burden to raise the presumption. The court found no grounds to interfere with the order of acquittal, dismissing the appeal and confirming the impugned judgment. An honorarium was directed to be paid, acknowledging the amicus curiae's service. en-us Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:12:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423454 The court affirmed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under section 138 of the N.I. Act, as the appellant failed to establish the monetary transaction and discharge the burden to raise the presumption. The court found no grounds to interfere with the order of acquittal, dismissing the appeal and confirming the impugned judgment. An honorarium was directed to be paid, acknowledging the amicus curiae's service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423454