<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2122 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302595</link>
    <description>The case involved issues regarding the confirmation of addition on account of arm&#039;s length price (ALP), disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, computation of interest under section 234B, and penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c). The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of certain comparables for ALP determination and remanding the disallowance issue for further verification. The matter of interest computation was not detailed in the judgment, typically requiring recalculations post-appeal adjustments. The initiation of penalty proceedings was deemed premature, pending the final reassessment outcome. Key issues were remanded for reconsideration and verification by the AO/TPO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 07:39:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2122 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302595</link>
      <description>The case involved issues regarding the confirmation of addition on account of arm&#039;s length price (ALP), disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, computation of interest under section 234B, and penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c). The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of certain comparables for ALP determination and remanding the disallowance issue for further verification. The matter of interest computation was not detailed in the judgment, typically requiring recalculations post-appeal adjustments. The initiation of penalty proceedings was deemed premature, pending the final reassessment outcome. Key issues were remanded for reconsideration and verification by the AO/TPO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>