https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302591 Prior conversion of the land to non-agricultural use, under an unchallenged order, changed its character and left no realistic basis to treat it as agricultural for occupancy rights. The existence of mango trees or asserted cultivation was insufficient to displace that finding. As the material on record admitted of no outcome other than rejection of the occupancy rights claim, a remand for reconsideration was unwarranted and would only prolong litigation. The remand direction was therefore set aside, while the rejection of occupancy rights was maintained on the existing record. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:35:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302591 Prior conversion of the land to non-agricultural use, under an unchallenged order, changed its character and left no realistic basis to treat it as agricultural for occupancy rights. The existence of mango trees or asserted cultivation was insufficient to displace that finding. As the material on record admitted of no outcome other than rejection of the occupancy rights claim, a remand for reconsideration was unwarranted and would only prolong litigation. The remand direction was therefore set aside, while the rejection of occupancy rights was maintained on the existing record. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302591