https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302590 Preventive detention grounds must be sufficiently definite to enable an effective representation, but they need not set out every underlying material fact. The grounds here were not vague because they clearly conveyed the factual basis of the apprehended prejudicial conduct, including alleged advocacy of violence and instigation affecting public order. The Court also held that the challenged statements, read as a whole, had a rational connection with maintenance of public order and were not irrelevant. As none of the grounds was shown to be irrelevant, the detention order was upheld. en-us Wed, 20 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:24:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302590 Preventive detention grounds must be sufficiently definite to enable an effective representation, but they need not set out every underlying material fact. The grounds here were not vague because they clearly conveyed the factual basis of the apprehended prejudicial conduct, including alleged advocacy of violence and instigation affecting public order. The Court also held that the challenged statements, read as a whole, had a rational connection with maintenance of public order and were not irrelevant. As none of the grounds was shown to be irrelevant, the detention order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302590