<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 898 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302589</link>
    <description>In preventive detention matters, where the detenu is already on conditional bail, the bail application and bail order are vital materials bearing directly on the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction and the necessity for detention. Failure to consider those documents vitiates the detention order for non-application of mind to relevant material. The Court also accepted that, in an appropriate case, a fresh detention order may be passed after due consideration of the omitted material, although that course was not practicable on the facts because the detention period was near expiry. The detention order was therefore set aside and release directed unless required in another case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:00:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 898 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302589</link>
      <description>In preventive detention matters, where the detenu is already on conditional bail, the bail application and bail order are vital materials bearing directly on the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction and the necessity for detention. Failure to consider those documents vitiates the detention order for non-application of mind to relevant material. The Court also accepted that, in an appropriate case, a fresh detention order may be passed after due consideration of the omitted material, although that course was not practicable on the facts because the detention period was near expiry. The detention order was therefore set aside and release directed unless required in another case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>