https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302588 Inherent jurisdiction under section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot ordinarily be used to quash criminal proceedings or interrupt an ongoing investigation at a pre-final report stage, absent a clear legal impediment or other exceptional ground; the High Court was therefore justified in declining interference. The Court also held that reasonable bail conditions, including surrender of passport and a bar on leaving India, were valid where imposed to address absconding risk and accepted by the accused when securing release, so they could not later be reopened under section 561-A. The appeal accordingly failed. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jun 2022 14:25:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302588 Inherent jurisdiction under section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot ordinarily be used to quash criminal proceedings or interrupt an ongoing investigation at a pre-final report stage, absent a clear legal impediment or other exceptional ground; the High Court was therefore justified in declining interference. The Court also held that reasonable bail conditions, including surrender of passport and a bar on leaving India, were valid where imposed to address absconding risk and accepted by the accused when securing release, so they could not later be reopened under section 561-A. The appeal accordingly failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302588