<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 992 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302587</link>
    <description>Criminal complaints under foreign exchange laws could not be continued where the adjudicating authority had already recorded a complete exoneration on merits on the same facts and that order had attained finality. Although adjudication and criminal prosecution may proceed simultaneously and one does not ordinarily control the other, final exoneration in adjudication removes the factual basis for prosecution because criminal liability must still be proved to a stricter standard. On identical allegations, continuation of the complaints was therefore unjustified, and the complaints and consequential proceedings were liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 11:11:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 992 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302587</link>
      <description>Criminal complaints under foreign exchange laws could not be continued where the adjudicating authority had already recorded a complete exoneration on merits on the same facts and that order had attained finality. Although adjudication and criminal prosecution may proceed simultaneously and one does not ordinarily control the other, final exoneration in adjudication removes the factual basis for prosecution because criminal liability must still be proved to a stricter standard. On identical allegations, continuation of the complaints was therefore unjustified, and the complaints and consequential proceedings were liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>