<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 288 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order quashing the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, citing vague reasons and procedural errors in the reopening process. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the addition of Rs. 25,32,35,000 under Section 68 as the reassessment was invalidated. The decision highlighted the importance of providing specific and detailed reasons for reopening assessments, as per legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 288 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order quashing the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, citing vague reasons and procedural errors in the reopening process. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the addition of Rs. 25,32,35,000 under Section 68 as the reassessment was invalidated. The decision highlighted the importance of providing specific and detailed reasons for reopening assessments, as per legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>