https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423446 Temporary injunction restraining alienation of suit properties was upheld because the materials showed a prima facie case that the properties were purchased in the plaintiff's name with loan repayment by him, while the defendant failed to show an independent source of income; the balance of convenience favoured preserving the properties to avoid prejudice and further complications. The limitation objection was also not accepted at the interlocutory stage, as the relevant point for limitation was the alleged denial of the plaintiff's right, not merely the date of purchase, leaving the issue open for trial if properly framed. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:37:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423446 Temporary injunction restraining alienation of suit properties was upheld because the materials showed a prima facie case that the properties were purchased in the plaintiff's name with loan repayment by him, while the defendant failed to show an independent source of income; the balance of convenience favoured preserving the properties to avoid prejudice and further complications. The limitation objection was also not accepted at the interlocutory stage, as the relevant point for limitation was the alleged denial of the plaintiff's right, not merely the date of purchase, leaving the issue open for trial if properly framed. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423446