<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 269 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423428</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities. It found that the loss incurred was capital in nature and not allowable under the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the requirement of a transfer of assets for a capital loss to be carried forward, distinguishing between revenue and capital losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 269 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423428</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities. It found that the loss incurred was capital in nature and not allowable under the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the requirement of a transfer of assets for a capital loss to be carried forward, distinguishing between revenue and capital losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>