<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 267 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee concerning the denial of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The dispute arose from the treatment of corpus donation as income, with the Tribunal emphasizing that rectification under section 154 is only applicable for obvious mistakes, not debatable points of law. The Tribunal concluded that the rectification petition was debatable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:36:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 267 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee concerning the denial of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The dispute arose from the treatment of corpus donation as income, with the Tribunal emphasizing that rectification under section 154 is only applicable for obvious mistakes, not debatable points of law. The Tribunal concluded that the rectification petition was debatable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>