<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 266 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423425</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed as the penalty was imposed without proper verification and without specifying the charge in the penalty notice. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations and the need for clarity in penalty notices under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:36:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 266 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423425</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed as the penalty was imposed without proper verification and without specifying the charge in the penalty notice. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations and the need for clarity in penalty notices under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>