<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1534 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302572</link>
    <description>The statutory scheme for municipal governance required Section 27 of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 to be read harmoniously with the provisions on election, removal and nomination of the Mayor. Because executive power vested in the Empowered Standing Committee and its members were nominated by the Mayor, the tenure of those members could not continue after the nominating Mayor left office. A literal reading would preserve nominations made by a removed Mayor, deprive the successor Mayor of nomination power, create an anomalous and unequal result, and undermine the working of the statutory scheme. Section 27 was therefore read down and made subject to the connected provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 15:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1534 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302572</link>
      <description>The statutory scheme for municipal governance required Section 27 of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 to be read harmoniously with the provisions on election, removal and nomination of the Mayor. Because executive power vested in the Empowered Standing Committee and its members were nominated by the Mayor, the tenure of those members could not continue after the nominating Mayor left office. A literal reading would preserve nominations made by a removed Mayor, deprive the successor Mayor of nomination power, create an anomalous and unequal result, and undermine the working of the statutory scheme. Section 27 was therefore read down and made subject to the connected provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>