https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423413 The Gujarat HC addressed a challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 103(1)(b) of the GST Acts regarding levy of GST on fryums/papad. The Appellate Authority determined that papad are commercially known as fryums rather than papad. The petitioner challenged Section 103(1)(b) as manifestly arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The HC noted that constitutional validity of the same provision is already under challenge in a pending case before a coordinate bench, with hearing scheduled for June 8, 2022. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on June 15, 2022. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423413 The Gujarat HC addressed a challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 103(1)(b) of the GST Acts regarding levy of GST on fryums/papad. The Appellate Authority determined that papad are commercially known as fryums rather than papad. The petitioner challenged Section 103(1)(b) as manifestly arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The HC noted that constitutional validity of the same provision is already under challenge in a pending case before a coordinate bench, with hearing scheduled for June 8, 2022. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on June 15, 2022. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423413