<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 232 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act was unjustified. It held that the assessee should not be treated differently from other co-owners in similar situations, citing principles of equality and fairness. The Tribunal emphasized that the revenue lacked evidence to support the addition and deleted the Rs. 1,62,437/- addition made by the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2015-16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2022 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 232 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act was unjustified. It held that the assessee should not be treated differently from other co-owners in similar situations, citing principles of equality and fairness. The Tribunal emphasized that the revenue lacked evidence to support the addition and deleted the Rs. 1,62,437/- addition made by the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2015-16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>