<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 228 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423387</link>
    <description>Section 80JJAA was discussed in relation to whether software employees qualify as workmen and how the 300-day condition applies, with the matter to be reconsidered by the Assessing Officer in light of binding High Court precedent. Disallowance of software purchases, annual maintenance charges and communication/data-link charges under sections 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia) was examined against later judicial clarification on royalty and the nature of software expenditure; the software-capitalisation aspect required fresh review, while the communication/data-link payment was treated as a facility charge not giving rise to taxable income in India. Legal and professional fees paid to non-resident foreign firms were held not to be fees for technical services, as the services were rendered India and the treaty make-available condition was not met, so no TDS obligation arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 228 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423387</link>
      <description>Section 80JJAA was discussed in relation to whether software employees qualify as workmen and how the 300-day condition applies, with the matter to be reconsidered by the Assessing Officer in light of binding High Court precedent. Disallowance of software purchases, annual maintenance charges and communication/data-link charges under sections 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia) was examined against later judicial clarification on royalty and the nature of software expenditure; the software-capitalisation aspect required fresh review, while the communication/data-link payment was treated as a facility charge not giving rise to taxable income in India. Legal and professional fees paid to non-resident foreign firms were held not to be fees for technical services, as the services were rendered India and the treaty make-available condition was not met, so no TDS obligation arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>