<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 219 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423378</link>
    <description>The HC addressed jurisdictional issues concerning DRI officials&#039; authority under the Customs Act, 1962, and emphasized awaiting the SC&#039;s decision before final determinations. The HC allowed the appeals, remanded the cases to the CESTAT, and directed matters to remain pending, ensuring no coercive action against respondents, leaving substantial legal questions open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 219 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423378</link>
      <description>The HC addressed jurisdictional issues concerning DRI officials&#039; authority under the Customs Act, 1962, and emphasized awaiting the SC&#039;s decision before final determinations. The HC allowed the appeals, remanded the cases to the CESTAT, and directed matters to remain pending, ensuring no coercive action against respondents, leaving substantial legal questions open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>