<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 211 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no hindrance to entertain the application under Section 95 of IBC, appointing Mr. Maligi Madhusudhana Reddy as the IRP. The judgment emphasized adherence to the procedural requirements and timelines outlined in the IBC for a smooth insolvency resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 211 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no hindrance to entertain the application under Section 95 of IBC, appointing Mr. Maligi Madhusudhana Reddy as the IRP. The judgment emphasized adherence to the procedural requirements and timelines outlined in the IBC for a smooth insolvency resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>