<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 210 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423369</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the IBC for initiation of CIRP proceedings against the Respondent due to serious disputes over the payment amount, lack of privity of contract, and the need for further investigation. The application was dismissed without costs, highlighting the complexity of the issues and the necessity for a detailed examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:27:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 210 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423369</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the IBC for initiation of CIRP proceedings against the Respondent due to serious disputes over the payment amount, lack of privity of contract, and the need for further investigation. The application was dismissed without costs, highlighting the complexity of the issues and the necessity for a detailed examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>