<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29117</link>
    <description>The court found that the reassessment proceedings were barred by limitation as the notice under section 142(1) of the Act was issued after the expiry date, rendering further proceedings illegal and void. The court, citing relevant case law, concluded that the reassessment proceedings were time-barred, leading to the success of the application. Consequently, a writ of mandamus was issued to recall and withdraw the impugned notices for the assessment years in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:40:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29117</link>
      <description>The court found that the reassessment proceedings were barred by limitation as the notice under section 142(1) of the Act was issued after the expiry date, rendering further proceedings illegal and void. The court, citing relevant case law, concluded that the reassessment proceedings were time-barred, leading to the success of the application. Consequently, a writ of mandamus was issued to recall and withdraw the impugned notices for the assessment years in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>