<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 197 - HIMCHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423356</link>
    <description>The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was quashed, and the conviction/sentence judgment set aside by the court. The parties reached a settlement, reducing the agreement to writing and agreeing to installment payments. The complainant received a portion of the compensation, with a balance remaining. Both parties confirmed the settlement was voluntary. Consequently, the complainant withdrew the complaint, and the matter was compounded. The accused was acquitted of the accusations, with a reduced compounding fee of Rs.5,000 imposed instead of the standard 15% of the cheque amount. Failure to deposit the fee within four weeks would result in the revival of the convictions and sentences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:26:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 197 - HIMCHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423356</link>
      <description>The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was quashed, and the conviction/sentence judgment set aside by the court. The parties reached a settlement, reducing the agreement to writing and agreeing to installment payments. The complainant received a portion of the compensation, with a balance remaining. Both parties confirmed the settlement was voluntary. Consequently, the complainant withdrew the complaint, and the matter was compounded. The accused was acquitted of the accusations, with a reduced compounding fee of Rs.5,000 imposed instead of the standard 15% of the cheque amount. Failure to deposit the fee within four weeks would result in the revival of the convictions and sentences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>