<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the disallowances made under sections 40A(2) and 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the need for the AO to provide cogent evidence when making disallowances and recognized the distinction between professional and technical services under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2022 19:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the disallowances made under sections 40A(2) and 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the need for the AO to provide cogent evidence when making disallowances and recognized the distinction between professional and technical services under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>