https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302557 Interference with refusal of temporary injunction is justified only where the trial court's discretion is shown to be unreasonable or capricious. In an interim injunction dispute over claimed joint family property, the applicant had to establish a clear prima facie case, but the properties stood in the respondent's name and no material at the interlocutory stage showed that the claim fell within the coparcenary exception to the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Prior admissions in an earlier plaint were relevant but not conclusive, and the asserted risk of alienation or loss of amenities did not demonstrate irreparable injury when the alleged share could still be worked out in partition proceedings. en-us Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jun 2022 17:58:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302557 Interference with refusal of temporary injunction is justified only where the trial court's discretion is shown to be unreasonable or capricious. In an interim injunction dispute over claimed joint family property, the applicant had to establish a clear prima facie case, but the properties stood in the respondent's name and no material at the interlocutory stage showed that the claim fell within the coparcenary exception to the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Prior admissions in an earlier plaint were relevant but not conclusive, and the asserted risk of alienation or loss of amenities did not demonstrate irreparable injury when the alleged share could still be worked out in partition proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302557