https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423355 Appellate interference with an interlocutory writ order was declined because the dispute turned on disputed factual questions about ownership of the goods and vehicle, together with the applicability of Central and State enactments, which were left for final adjudication by the writ court. No error was found in the impugned order warranting intra-court intervention, and the appellate court refused to usurp the learned single Judge's jurisdiction. The interim challenge therefore failed, leaving the writ proceedings to be decided independently and uninfluenced by the appellate observations. en-us Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423355 Appellate interference with an interlocutory writ order was declined because the dispute turned on disputed factual questions about ownership of the goods and vehicle, together with the applicability of Central and State enactments, which were left for final adjudication by the writ court. No error was found in the impugned order warranting intra-court intervention, and the appellate court refused to usurp the learned single Judge's jurisdiction. The interim challenge therefore failed, leaving the writ proceedings to be decided independently and uninfluenced by the appellate observations. Case-Laws GST Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423355