<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 171 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423330</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the NCLT&#039;s order and directed the restoration of the appellant company&#039;s name in the register of companies. The appellant was required to comply with specific conditions, including payment of costs, clearance of dues, filing of financial documents, and meeting statutory requirements within specified timelines. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2022 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 171 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423330</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the NCLT&#039;s order and directed the restoration of the appellant company&#039;s name in the register of companies. The appellant was required to comply with specific conditions, including payment of costs, clearance of dues, filing of financial documents, and meeting statutory requirements within specified timelines. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>