<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 170 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423329</link>
    <description>For Section 7 insolvency proceedings, limitation runs from the date of default, but it is extended by a clear written acknowledgment of liability made before expiry of limitation. Balance sheet entries, balance confirmations, payment requests, and settlement correspondence may amount to such acknowledgment where they admit dues and preserve a live jural relationship. The words &quot;without prejudice&quot; do not, by themselves, negate an acknowledgment if the communication otherwise admits liability. An authorisation objection failed where the filing was supported by the managing director&#039;s authority, and prior SARFAESI action did not bar commencement of CIRP because the Code has overriding effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2022 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 170 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423329</link>
      <description>For Section 7 insolvency proceedings, limitation runs from the date of default, but it is extended by a clear written acknowledgment of liability made before expiry of limitation. Balance sheet entries, balance confirmations, payment requests, and settlement correspondence may amount to such acknowledgment where they admit dues and preserve a live jural relationship. The words &quot;without prejudice&quot; do not, by themselves, negate an acknowledgment if the communication otherwise admits liability. An authorisation objection failed where the filing was supported by the managing director&#039;s authority, and prior SARFAESI action did not bar commencement of CIRP because the Code has overriding effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>