<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1245 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302551</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of the CIT(A)-3 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The issues were remitted back to the AO for readjudication, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles. The Tribunal stressed the importance of allowing the authorized representative to cross-examine witnesses and ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessee to respond to the evidence presented against them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2022 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1245 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302551</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of the CIT(A)-3 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The issues were remitted back to the AO for readjudication, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles. The Tribunal stressed the importance of allowing the authorized representative to cross-examine witnesses and ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessee to respond to the evidence presented against them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>