<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 594 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302545</link>
    <description>Failure to file annual returns and balance sheet was treated as a continuing default so long as the statutory documents remained unfurnished, because the penalty scheme was designed to enforce ongoing compliance. A company&#039;s alleged defunct status did not extinguish the filing obligation; until removal from the register, it still had to comply, including by filing nil returns where appropriate. The offence was also held not to require mens rea, since the provisions penalised non-compliance itself and did not import any need to prove intent, knowledge, wilfulness, or fraud. The convictions were therefore sustained on proof of default alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 14:59:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 594 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302545</link>
      <description>Failure to file annual returns and balance sheet was treated as a continuing default so long as the statutory documents remained unfurnished, because the penalty scheme was designed to enforce ongoing compliance. A company&#039;s alleged defunct status did not extinguish the filing obligation; until removal from the register, it still had to comply, including by filing nil returns where appropriate. The offence was also held not to require mens rea, since the provisions penalised non-compliance itself and did not import any need to prove intent, knowledge, wilfulness, or fraud. The convictions were therefore sustained on proof of default alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>