<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 123 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423282</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest based on the interpretations of legal provisions and judicial precedents. The Tribunal quashed the revisional order of the Principal Commissioner, holding that when two plausible views exist, and the Assessing Officer has taken one, the order cannot be considered erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 123 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423282</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest based on the interpretations of legal provisions and judicial precedents. The Tribunal quashed the revisional order of the Principal Commissioner, holding that when two plausible views exist, and the Assessing Officer has taken one, the order cannot be considered erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>