<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1243 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302540</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order, directing reassessment of disallowances under sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, following a new Supreme Court ruling. The addition under sec. 68 was deemed unjustified due to flawed reasoning by the AO, leading to deletion of the disallowance. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1243 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302540</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order, directing reassessment of disallowances under sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, following a new Supreme Court ruling. The addition under sec. 68 was deemed unjustified due to flawed reasoning by the AO, leading to deletion of the disallowance. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>