https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423256 The Supreme Court held that the Kerala State Legislature had the legislative competence to enact the Kerala Revocation of Arbitration Clauses and Reopening of Awards Act, 1998, under Entry 13 of List III. The Presidential assent validated the State Act despite any repugnancy with the Central Act. However, the Court found that the State Act encroached upon judicial power by annulling awards that had become "Rules of Court," violating the doctrine of separation of powers. Consequently, the State Act was deemed unconstitutional, and the appeals were disposed of with the State Act being struck down. en-us Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jun 2022 13:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423256 The Supreme Court held that the Kerala State Legislature had the legislative competence to enact the Kerala Revocation of Arbitration Clauses and Reopening of Awards Act, 1998, under Entry 13 of List III. The Presidential assent validated the State Act despite any repugnancy with the Central Act. However, the Court found that the State Act encroached upon judicial power by annulling awards that had become "Rules of Court," violating the doctrine of separation of powers. Consequently, the State Act was deemed unconstitutional, and the appeals were disposed of with the State Act being struck down. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423256