https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302531 An inclusive definition in a commercial crops statute can validly authorise the Government to notify additional commodities where the Act's policy, object and scheme supply adequate guidance. The power under Section 2(i-a) was therefore not excessive delegation and did not violate Article 14, because it was confined to crops of commercial significance needing regulation. Notifications issued under the existing Act were also not repugnant to Article 301, as they operated within the parent law and were protected by Article 305. The objection that the Section 4 notification was issued without considering representations failed on the record, which showed that objections were examined before issuance. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2022 16:15:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302531 An inclusive definition in a commercial crops statute can validly authorise the Government to notify additional commodities where the Act's policy, object and scheme supply adequate guidance. The power under Section 2(i-a) was therefore not excessive delegation and did not violate Article 14, because it was confined to crops of commercial significance needing regulation. Notifications issued under the existing Act were also not repugnant to Article 301, as they operated within the parent law and were protected by Article 305. The objection that the Section 4 notification was issued without considering representations failed on the record, which showed that objections were examined before issuance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jun 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302531