<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NCLT Can&#039;t Review Orders on Substantial Issues, Can Recall if Reply Rights Were Missed Due to Unused Chances.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63821</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction - Power of NCLT to recall its order - No doubt that the Adjudicating Authority has no jurisdiction to review its order after deciding a substantial issue but it has the jurisdiction to recall the order of the kind in dispute i.e. where the right to Reply was closed by an order on the ground that the opportunities granted were not availed. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:28:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:28:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NCLT Can&#039;t Review Orders on Substantial Issues, Can Recall if Reply Rights Were Missed Due to Unused Chances.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63821</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction - Power of NCLT to recall its order - No doubt that the Adjudicating Authority has no jurisdiction to review its order after deciding a substantial issue but it has the jurisdiction to recall the order of the kind in dispute i.e. where the right to Reply was closed by an order on the ground that the opportunities granted were not availed. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:28:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>