<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 40 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner had no jurisdiction under section 263 to set aside the assessment order passed by the ITO as it had merged with the order of the AAC. The decision was based on the principle that the appellate decision is the operative decision in law. Consequently, the reference was answered in favor of the assessee, and each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 40 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner had no jurisdiction under section 263 to set aside the assessment order passed by the ITO as it had merged with the order of the AAC. The decision was based on the principle that the appellate decision is the operative decision in law. Consequently, the reference was answered in favor of the assessee, and each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>