<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 91 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423250</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, finding the notice validly issued within the limitation period. It upheld the jurisdiction of the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) and determined that the notice was served correctly. The court held that the petitioner was offered a virtual hearing in line with the Faceless Assessment Scheme, concluding that there was no violation of natural justice. Additionally, the court emphasized the availability of alternative remedies under the Income Tax Act, dismissing the petition as the petitioner had not exhausted these remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 91 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423250</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, finding the notice validly issued within the limitation period. It upheld the jurisdiction of the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) and determined that the notice was served correctly. The court held that the petitioner was offered a virtual hearing in line with the Faceless Assessment Scheme, concluding that there was no violation of natural justice. Additionally, the court emphasized the availability of alternative remedies under the Income Tax Act, dismissing the petition as the petitioner had not exhausted these remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>