https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423216 The Tribunal found merit in the petitioner's allegations of oppression and mismanagement, noting that the Respondents had illegally taken control of the company and prejudiced the petitioner's interests. Discrepancies in share allotment and transfer were confirmed, supporting the petitioner's claims. The Tribunal rejected the limitation argument, considering the petitioner's timely actions upon discovering the issues. An independent valuer was appointed to assess the fair value of the company's shares, with the aim of resolving the dispute fairly and maintaining the company's interests. Further proceedings were scheduled pending the valuer's report. en-us Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423216 The Tribunal found merit in the petitioner's allegations of oppression and mismanagement, noting that the Respondents had illegally taken control of the company and prejudiced the petitioner's interests. Discrepancies in share allotment and transfer were confirmed, supporting the petitioner's claims. The Tribunal rejected the limitation argument, considering the petitioner's timely actions upon discovering the issues. An independent valuer was appointed to assess the fair value of the company's shares, with the aim of resolving the dispute fairly and maintaining the company's interests. Further proceedings were scheduled pending the valuer's report. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423216