https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423215 The Tribunal granted the Appellant Company's petition for restoration of its name in the register of companies under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal found merit in the Appellant's evidence showing business activities and determined that restoration was just and equitable, benefiting stakeholders. Specific directions were issued, including filing pending documents, paying a restoration cost, and publication requirements. The order emphasized the company's legitimacy and compliance, allowing for reinstatement while not precluding further legal actions by the Registrar of Companies for other violations. Compliance with legal formalities and regulatory obligations was mandated for the restoration process. en-us Tue, 17 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:41:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423215 The Tribunal granted the Appellant Company's petition for restoration of its name in the register of companies under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal found merit in the Appellant's evidence showing business activities and determined that restoration was just and equitable, benefiting stakeholders. Specific directions were issued, including filing pending documents, paying a restoration cost, and publication requirements. The order emphasized the company's legitimacy and compliance, allowing for reinstatement while not precluding further legal actions by the Registrar of Companies for other violations. Compliance with legal formalities and regulatory obligations was mandated for the restoration process. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 17 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423215