<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 53 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423212</link>
    <description>Unpaid interest alone cannot trigger CIRP under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code where the entire principal debt has already been discharged. Reading the definitions of &quot;financial debt&quot;, &quot;debt&quot; and &quot;claim&quot; together, the tribunal treated interest as inseparable from a subsisting underlying debt and held that it cannot be pursued in isolation once the principal liability no longer exists. Proceedings maintained only to recover interest, without a surviving debt, were also noted as potentially contrary to the object of the Code and capable of attracting Section 65. The insolvency petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:41:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 53 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423212</link>
      <description>Unpaid interest alone cannot trigger CIRP under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code where the entire principal debt has already been discharged. Reading the definitions of &quot;financial debt&quot;, &quot;debt&quot; and &quot;claim&quot; together, the tribunal treated interest as inseparable from a subsisting underlying debt and held that it cannot be pursued in isolation once the principal liability no longer exists. Proceedings maintained only to recover interest, without a surviving debt, were also noted as potentially contrary to the object of the Code and capable of attracting Section 65. The insolvency petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>