https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423200 The appeal was filed challenging the confirmation of a proposed demand against the appellant due to non-production of original documents. The Order-in-Original confirmed a demand of Rs.1,54,639/- with a penalty of the same amount. The appellant argued all requisite documents were provided during the investigation, emphasizing no wrongful passing of duty incidence occurred. The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed demands due to non-production of original documents. The matter was remanded for reconsideration based on documents provided by the appellant. The appeal was allowed for further review and consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) within four months. en-us Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:40:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423200 The appeal was filed challenging the confirmation of a proposed demand against the appellant due to non-production of original documents. The Order-in-Original confirmed a demand of Rs.1,54,639/- with a penalty of the same amount. The appellant argued all requisite documents were provided during the investigation, emphasizing no wrongful passing of duty incidence occurred. The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed demands due to non-production of original documents. The matter was remanded for reconsideration based on documents provided by the appellant. The appeal was allowed for further review and consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) within four months. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423200