https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423189 The court set aside the rejection of the compounding application by the fourth respondent and directed the fourth respondent to compound the offence by fixing the compounding fee to be paid by the petitioner. The court emphasized the petitioner's age, status, and prolonged prosecution as factors warranting a favorable consideration for compounding the offence. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423189 The court set aside the rejection of the compounding application by the fourth respondent and directed the fourth respondent to compound the offence by fixing the compounding fee to be paid by the petitioner. The court emphasized the petitioner's age, status, and prolonged prosecution as factors warranting a favorable consideration for compounding the offence. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423189