<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 23 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423182</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by upholding the treatment of share capital as unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to discrepancies in financial statements. Disallowance under section 40A(3) was affirmed for certain expenditures, with exceptions for genuine cash payments to directors. The tribunal referred back the depreciation disallowance issue for fresh adjudication, requiring the appellant to provide relevant details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 23 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423182</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by upholding the treatment of share capital as unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to discrepancies in financial statements. Disallowance under section 40A(3) was affirmed for certain expenditures, with exceptions for genuine cash payments to directors. The tribunal referred back the depreciation disallowance issue for fresh adjudication, requiring the appellant to provide relevant details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>